What strategy does Gottman recommend for "emotionally disengaging" during heated arguments?

The recommended strategy for "emotionally disengaging" during heated arguments, as outlined by Gottman, is to take a break to gain clarity before resuming the discussion. This approach allows individuals to step away from the intense emotions that can cloud judgment and communication. By taking a break, partners can cool down, reflect on their feelings, and approach the conversation with a clearer, more rational mindset when they return. This strategy not only helps in reducing the likelihood of saying hurtful things in the heat of the moment but also facilitates healthier communication and problem-solving once both individuals feel more composed.

In contrast, shouting louder, walking away permanently, or seeking a third-party mediator might exacerbate the emotional turmoil or conflict. Shouting can escalate tensions and lead to further misunderstandings. Walking away permanently implies an unwillingness to resolve issues, which can foster resentment. Engaging a third-party mediator without first allowing partners to manage their emotions might not be productive if the underlying issues haven't been addressed individually. Therefore, taking a timeout is seen as a constructive method aligned with Gottman's principles for conflict resolution in relationships.